Re: Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To

[Thomas Roessler]

On 2000-06-30 01:10:22 -0400, Hugo Haas wrote:

> It makes sense. Now I'm convinced that Mail-Followup-To
> is useful. I'll still be frustrated, but I am
> convinced. :-)

> I found an Internet Draft about it, but it expired 2
> years ago:

>       http://qmail.edge.ne.jp/mta/ietf/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt

> Maybe it's time to write a new one.

According to DJB, the IETF is not going to accept
Mail-Followup-To, which, he claims, is the reason why he
doesn't write any more drafts.