[ Sorry, there is no In-Reply-To field because I forgot to set the
correct headers in my original message, and I couldn't extract the
message-id from the archive... ]
On 2000-06-27, fman wrote:
> try my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My suggestion wasn't clear enough. Here's what I was proposing:
Suppose that I want to send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and that I
am not subscribed to this list. I would like replies to go to the list
and myself.
It is currently possible to have Mutt put the following header
automatically:
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
However, this is not standard and doesn't work very well in practice. So
I was suggesting to add an option to do the same using Reply-To instead
of Mail-Followup-To such as:
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
since it seems legitimate to me to use Reply-To in such a case (which I
did this time).
I don't think that it's possible to do this with send-hooks (or if it
is, I'd be very interested to see how to make send-hook interact with
the From, To, Cc and the value of lists and subscribe), so it would
require some new code.
I hope this is clearer now.
--
Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://larve.net/people/hugo/
Marge, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen. -- Homer J.
Simpson
