On 19-Jun-2000, clemensF wrote: > > I've converted my mailboxes to maildir once, it turned out to be > > slower than mbox, so I converted back to mbox now. Dunno about MH, but > > I'm guessing it's about the same speed as maildir since it resembles > > maildir. > are your files on a network? Nope, so I guess there's no huge gain for me to switch to maildir. I'm still wondering why it's slower though (in general), maybe because it fopen() more times than mbox? The mailbox is on ext2fs if that makes any difference. Ronny
- Message attributes, MH folders Brett Coon
- Re: Message attributes, MH folders clemensF
- Re: Message attributes, MH folders Ronny Haryanto
- Re: Message attributes, MH folders clemensF
- Re: Message attributes, MH folders Gerhard den Hollander
- Re: Message attributes, MH fol... Brett Coon
- Re: Message attributes, MH... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: Message attributes, MH fol... clemensF
- Re: Message attributes, MH... David Champion
- Re: Message attributes, MH... Brett Coon
- Performance of Maildir -vs- mbox (w... Ronny Haryanto
- Performance of Maildir -vs- mb... Bennett Todd
- Re: Performance of Maildir... Brett Coon
- Re: Performance of Mai... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: Message attributes, MH folders Mikko Hänninen
- special flags (was "Re: Message attrib... David T-G
- Re: special flags (was "Re: Messag... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: special flags (was "Re: Me... Gerhard den Hollander
- Re: special flags (was "R... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: special flags (was "Re: Messag... David Champion
- Re: special flags (was "Re: Me... David Champion