Yea, the method of tagging the parts to forward, and then ``;f'' seems to work
fine for text, but not binaries... (in 1.0pre3i)
Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Rob
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 11:04:39AM -0700, Todd Strilchuk wrote:
>
> hmmm... i tried that with my version of mutt (0.95.6us) and it
> wouldn't include certain attachements in my message. for example,
> someone sent me a jpg file which i tried to forward on to someone
> else. i did the view attachement deal, "t"agged the text portion of
> the message AND the jpg attachement and then did a ";f". all that
> appeared in my outgoing message was the text portion of the original
> message (the jpg was nowhere to be found). are there any specific
> settings in the .muttrc that might control this behaviour?
>
> thanks,
> todd.
>
> > taken from Jan Houtsma (Oct 20)...
>
> >Ok, this is what you do. You view the message and you type "v" (View attachments).
> >You just tag (t) the attachments you want to forward.
> >
> >Now when u slected the attachments you want to forward, you now press ";f".
> >
> >The ; means that the next command operated on tagged stuff.
> >The f means forward.
> >
> >Now you can fill in the destination etc.. as usual.
> >
> >jan
> >On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 10:21:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> This is probably a silly question...
> >>
> >> I get an email that has several attachments. Say one is a word document (yea,
> >> people like to send me word documents that contain one paragraph...) and
> >> further say that I want to forward just the word document to someone. How do
> >> I do it?
> >>
> >> I tried $mime_forward, but that made the whole original email one attachment,
> >> and I couldn't see how to remove the parts I didn't want to forward.
> >>
> >> Tried starting a new message, using `A' (attach-message), and tagging original
> >> message; same deal. And just tagging the word document I wanted to forward
> >> didn't seem to do anything.
> >>
> >> I ended up saving the document, and attaching it... just seemed that there was
> >> probably a more direct route that I was just missing.
> >>
> >> TIA!
> >>
> >> Rob
>
> --
> todd
>
> Power corrupts, but we need electricity.
