Tim Pierce [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > It doesn't seem to me that a simple SMTP delivery-only client should > have to involve a great deal of code, and it could certainly be made a > compile-time option. > > I see at least two significant advantages to having SMTP delivery > support built directly into the client: AFAIK both things you mention can be dealt with using a minimal MTA that just acts as a forwarder, such as sSMTP. All you really have to do to configure it is set the remote mailhub's hostname. -- Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/ -----------------+-------------------------+------------------------------ "If Microsoft can change and compete on quality, I've won." -- L. Torvalds
- how to set up alternate SMTP server Raju K V
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Jeremy Blosser
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Frederic L . W . Meunier
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Shao Zhang
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP... Frederic L . W . Meunier
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Jeremy Blosser
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Thomas Roessler
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP server Tim Pierce
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP ser... Jeremy Blosser
- Re: how to set up alternate SMTP... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: how to set up alternate... Jeremy Blosser
- Re: how to set up alter... Shao Zhang
- Re: how to set up a... rutger
- Re: how to set up a... Tim Pierce
- Re: how to set up a... Fairlight
- Re: how to set up a... Jeremy Blosser
- Re: how to set up a... Brendan Cully
- Re: how to set up a... Mikko Hänninen
- Re: how to set up a... Tim Pierce