On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 09:48:56AM -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
[I wrote:]
> > do a group-reply when I hit 'r'? I often need to do a group-reply, but
> > forget and do a normal reply....
>
> Well, since a group of one could still be a group reply, why not just
> use 'g' all of the time, or even bind 'r' to group-reply (or whatever
> the actual command token is)? If you decide that you really didn't
> want to do a group reply, just get rid of the Cc: line and you're off
> and running.
Hmmmmm, I'd thought about the same thing, but for various reasons (all
political), that could be worse than forgetting to do a group-reply....
Sometimes I don't want the reply to go to everyone. :-)
[rest of .sig trimmed]
> > Down, not across. --alt.sysadmin.recovery motto
> :-D
That reminds me...I really, *REALLY* need to go back to lurking in asr.
I haven't been lurking there on a regular basis (with emphasis on ``on a
regular basis'') for a few years..... Perhaps tonight...a nice cigar, a
glass of homebrew (maybe the Kölschbier, or perhaps the rye porter),
and/or a glass of single-malt scotch, with ASR to lighten up the end of
the day. :-) Then again, I could just go hang out at one of the local
brewpubs (some would say *THE* local brewpub) with the brewer there and
get free beers that I didn't have to brew....
But I'm getting off the subject now.... Forgive me. It's the second
Monday of the week (tomorrow is the third Monday, and so on until the
weekend...at least, that's been the pattern for the last month or so).
Later,
---jim
--
73 DE N5IAL (/4) | "Debating unix flavors in the context of anything
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Microsoft is like talking about which ice cream
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | flavor tastes least like sawdust with turpentine
Ft. Walton Beach, FL | sauce." --(void) in alt.sysadmin.recovery
