On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 09:07:59AM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
What do we do with removed options? Do the elicit errors from the mutt startup, or maybe just a warning? (Thinking about using the same muttrc on machines with different mutt versions.)
That's a good point, which I neglected to mention is the downside to #3. It's most likely to cause pain to users.
Personally I'm leaning toward #1 to at least give users the choice (assuming there might be that one MTA, somewhere, that reads recips from the mail by default instead of looking at the arguments).
(*) and it would appear I've been using the default i.e. write_bcc=yes for years. I need to fix that.
Me too, and as Gero made me aware of, it affects exim4. Fortunately, I believe my provider is stripping the header for me, but it's certainly embarrassing.
-- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
