On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:56:24AM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
As can be read from the Debian bug, the original rationale was to be
able to keep Bcc-header in the Fcc copy, but not reveal the Bcc header
to the MTA, so whatever policy/decision it has, it can never spill it to
the recipients.

Thanks Fabian, Steffen, and Gero.

It sounds like this needs to be changed. I'm not sure I like the patch as-is, but the basic idea sounds reasonable to me.

I see three possibilities:

1) Change the default of $write_bcc to 'no', and also change the behavior so that Bcc is written to the Fcc mailbox regardless of the setting. This has the advantage of not changing any *documentated* behavior, as the option says nothing about Fcc. (Of course, I'd update the documentation and announce the changes.)

2) Change the behavior of $write_bcc to only control writing to the Fcc mailbox (as the patch does). My question is whether the option is
useful in this state.  Which leads to a third possibility:

3) Remove the option. Never write Bcc when sending, and always when Fcc'ing.

I likely won't be able to look at this for about a week, as I travel home, so opinions very welcome!

--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C  5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to