On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:15:48PM +0100, Richard Russon wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:27:06PM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > > > Regardless, I'm not convinced my under-development patch queues belong > > in a public repos. I'd like to know what's wrong with just posting the > > patches to the list when I'm ready to. > > Well now we have a good example. You have posted two versions of > several of eight patches. > > If you had a public repo, all we'd have to do is pull, compile, test. > The easier it is for we developers, the more likely we are to try.
As I mentioned earlier, I was still iterating the patches and I posted them early just for comment. Pushing to a public repos would make it difficult to modify the patches afterwards. Whether intentional or not, the condescension and near whininess in your tone makes me feel uninclined to listen to or even work with you. I'm sorry posted patches and the customs of this list are so unpleasant for you. If you really do want to work _with_ mutt-dev, perhaps you should make an attempt to adopt our customs rather than demand we match what you are used to. -- Kevin J. McCarthy GPG Fingerprint: 8975 A9B3 3AA3 7910 385C 5308 ADEF 7684 8031 6BDA http://www.8t8.us/configs/gpg-key-transition-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
