On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:26:21AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > >> Or, as Mutt is maintained in a Mercurial repo, to bitbucket. > > Git is largely becoming, if not already, the defacto overall long > term replacement to the post-CVS version control competition. > It's pretty much everywhere now, and therefore commands, and > will command, as common language, the largest set of available > developers. You need to think not of yesterday, not today, but > where project X is going to get it's developer pool in the future > after you're dead. Projects need to open up to tapping more > entry level developers and tap a patch coordinator/reviewer. And > have a good ticketing system. Then everyone can play.
I find Mercurial easier to use than git. Beyond that the type of version control used for mutt isn't that important compared to other mutt development issues. -- Will Fiveash
