On 28Oct2008 17:07, David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > I think the point of the current behavior is to be able to do
| > things like this:
| > mutt -a *.jpg -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Faced with this need in the past, I've gone with an enclosure notation:
|
| mutt -a { *.jpg } [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now that's neat! Visually pleasing, anyway. +1
However, given that the option parser is already set up for multiple
arguments, it there a strongly argument for this over, say:
mutt -g *.jpg -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i.e. don't overload -a with multiple modes, instead provide another
command option (-A is taken, alas). So here I'm stealing the -g of
another suggestion in this thread to say "-g: followed by a set of
filenames as might be produced from a glob, terminated by --".
So, -a: single filename, -g: multiple names but still with the shell
doing the globbing.
I'm -1 on the earlier "-g mutt-internal-globber" for a few reasons: it's
yet anther glob implementation, at variance with the globbing supported
in the user's shell; the variance/glob-dialect will be the subject of
dispute, and itself will need a long documentation; it doesn't handle
other usages, such as this:
mutt -g `command producing a list of files` -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Globbing is the common case but it's not exhaustive. The current "accept
a bunch of files however generated" handles everything but like some
others I'm a little unhappy with the overloaded behaviour of -a.
--
Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/
For reading rec.moto, I use one of those carbon-fiber Logitech mice w/a
little 'No Fear' sticker on it. - Mike Hardcore DoD#5010 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Apologies to Primus
