On Oct 19 10:57, Rocco Rutte wrote: > Hi, > > * Corinna Vinschen [07-10-18 12:30:42 +0200] wrote: >> On Oct 18 12:03, Rocco Rutte wrote: > >>> Without looking too deeply at the issue, when off_t is used, why can't we >>> use LOFF_T and OFF_T_FMT as defined by configure in config.h instead? On >>> first sight this seems to be the right way to go. That's at least what >>> mutt uses for large file support. > >> Sounds like the way to go. Sorry, I didn't realize that this is tested >> in configure already. > > I now did that replacements and attached that patch to bug #2191. Can you > please give it a try, too?
I did and it looks good now. Thank you! Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Project Co-Leader Red Hat
