Hi Neil, I’m not sure whether I follow the implications of the change completely, but since I no longer work with Mustache or Perl, it sounds completely reasonable to relinquish those permissions to Yannick.
Thanks! On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 2:26 AM Neil Bowers <neil.bow...@cogendo.com> wrote: > Hi Pieter, > > I’m one of the PAUSE admins, and I’m working through distributions that > have split ownership, typically caused because releasers with co-maint > added new packages: in the past PAUSE would give them first-come on the new > package. PAUSE now tries to ensure consistent permissions, so I’m working > through the historical cases[1]. > > Template-Mustache is one of these cases. You initially released it, so > have first-come on the lead module, Template::Mustache. Yanick Champoux > (YANICK) has done all releases since 2015, so has first-come on the rest of > the packages, which he added. Rik Signes (RJBS) did one release in between > you two, but he was lazy and didn’t add any packages, so just has co-maint > on everything. > > Following the default policy, you would get first-come on all packages, as > the originating author and holder of first-come on the lead module. But I > wonder if it would make more sense to give first-come to Yanick — if he > wants it — since he’s actively maintaining the distribution now? > > If you’re happy with this, I can make the changes for you. > > Cheers, > Neil > > [1] http://neilb.org/2020/07/24/inconsistent-permissions.html >