On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:02:40PM +0100, Matt S Trout wrote:
> Data::Selector ?
The problem with 'Selector' is that it doesn't tell you what the module
does. That's why Path was the most obvious choice. The only thing close
to that would be Tree, but then again I don't think people think of
trees as they do paths.
So I think 'Path' is the most obvious choice. Since Simple isn't liked,
what about the following?
- Data::Path::Manip
- Data::Path::Access
- Data::ByPath
If we do go down the "tree" path, how about:
- Data::Tree
- Data::Hierarchy
- Data::Directory
To be honest, after all these examples nothing is jumping at me and so I
still prefer Data::PathSimple.
Alfie
--
Alfie John
http://h4c.kr
