On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 08:29:47PM +1100, Alfie John wrote: > Any objection to Data::Tree? I could then rename the description to: > > Data::Tree - Navigate and manipulate data structures like a tree > > Otherwise, I'd be willing to hear some suggestions.
I can't really make a suggestion if you don't show any examples of usage. What distinguishes it from Data::SPath? From Data::DPath? From straight up XPath matching using an adaptor like Class::XPath? "It picks the right thing 80% of the time" is true of all of those from the point of view of the people -currently- using each one. I'm not using any yet - what's special about your module apart from "it's a different set of defaults" ? What made it worth being a separate module rather than a wrapper around SPath or DPath ? These are the questions you need answers to in order to pick a -good- name rather than a merely adequate one - you try and answer them and we'll try and help you come up with it :) -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our Catalyst commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
