Fine by me
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Matt S Trout <m...@shadowcat.co.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:35:23AM +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote: >> That all sounds fine to me. >> >> I'll just take EU:M and ::Win32 for the moment then. > > EU:M is upstream: blead and Florian Ragwitz is happy to take that - seems > like a simpler solution to me. > >> EU:C can sit where it is until I actually have a chance to apply, or >> something better takes it. > > Same, or I can always take it - currently waiting to find out if Chorny > wants to write tests for EUMM's MYMETA bugs to go with his code or if I > should fix and test it before attempting an EUMM release. > > Don't really mind except that I'd prefer rafl or I to you simply because > we already have the relevant core bits and the upstream: blead is relatively > sane for these dists. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a > clue > > http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ > > Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our Catalyst > commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team. >
