>>>>> On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:22:40 -0500, Jesse Vincent <je...@fsck.com> said:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:19:15AM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >> Sorry, I have missed what the original question was. Was it RAFL wants >> permissions to maintain ExtUtils::Command? > RAFL is working to dual life / update the cpan versions of numerous core > modules, a few at a time. I'd rather make this easier, rather than > harder for him ;) This is an excellent reason, of course, sorry I didn't get it. And now looking back through the history of this thread I can explain what made me confused. Your first message with the subject "P5P-owned CPAN modules" had an In-Reply-To header of In-Reply-To: <aanlkti=j6a8pbeyhnz=+zr=bqou2pa22mp8pqpon=...@mail.gmail.com> pointing to an unrelated posting. All's well, move on, there's nothing to see here... Cheers, -- andreas
