Dana Hudes wrote:
>
> I'm not sure quite how this works but I'm the currently active maintainer of
>Net::Whois along with the inactive maintainer Chip and therefore I think Chip and I
>own the namespace.
The reason that I contacted you was that I very surprised to find that
none of the Net::Whois modules are in the current 'official' cpan module
list.
http://www.perl.com/CPAN-local/modules/00modlist.long.html
> Considering that this code was offered in principle as complete many months ago and
>only sent to me the evening before this namespace proposal
> I think you all are running a bit quick and impatient.
Point taken. After having to wait for internal sign-off for so long,
I'm probably a bit _too_ anxious to move on this. Please accept my
apologizes for any breach in approval protocol.
> Not to mention you could have asked to have delegation of Net::Whois::RIPE to Chip
>and I directly in private.
> Slow down, and I'll check out your module and see where it fits with the other
>contributed code to handle various RIPE-style domains.
Well I thought [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the cpan name space authority, hence
I contacted them, but perhaps you are a member.
Awaiting your review,
Paulg.
--
For PGP Key ID B49E3514, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
send mail with Subject: pgp-key-request phoneto:+61-7-3367-0490
Paul Gampe - Technical Manager - APNIC faxto:+61-7-3367-0482
*** APNIC Meeting Oct 2000 - http://www.apnic.net/meetings ***
