On Tuesday 13 March 2007 14:23, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 07:43:38AM -0500, David Golden wrote: > > That said, i agree in the meantime that providing a traditional > > Makefile.PL along with a Build.PL is usually a wise approach, as Chris > > suggested. > > But to my knowledge, I can't do that, because I have some > 'build_requires' lines. I previously had a long discussion about using > Test::Exception, my hesiation centring around the problem that it isn't > a core module, so how to guarantee testing against it. The suggestion > was to use M::B and 'build_require' it. So I don't really want to back > out of that now
Why don't y'all just use Module::Install? It handles build_requires, AND you
can bundle modules with your dist, in case dependencies worry you. Problems
solved.
Regards,
Jonathan Rockway
--
package JAPH;use Catalyst qw/-Debug/;($;=JAPH)->config(name => do {
$,.=reverse qw[Jonathan tsu rehton lre rekca Rockway][$_].[split //,
";$;"]->[$_].q; ;for 1..4;$,=~s;^.;;;$,});$;->setup;
pgpWwlekGGMZt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
