On 11 Mar 2007, at 18:49, Chris Dolan wrote:
On Mar 11, 2007, at 7:43 AM, David Golden wrote:
That said, i agree in the meantime that providing a traditional
Makefile.PL along with a Build.PL is usually a wise approach, as
Chris
suggested.
Just to expand these thoughts, every one of the modules I maintain
is Module::Build-based and I've never had a smoke report that
failed due to a Module::Build problem. And, yes, I'm a CPANPLUS
user. If your Build.PL is fairly simple, create_makefile_pl =>
'traditional' is a very reliable fallback.
[snip]
Ditto. The only problem I ever had with M::B was mine rather than
M::B's :-)
Adrian
