On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 07:43:38AM -0500, David Golden wrote: > That said, i agree in the meantime that providing a traditional > Makefile.PL along with a Build.PL is usually a wise approach, as Chris > suggested.
But to my knowledge, I can't do that, because I have some 'build_requires' lines. I previously had a long discussion about using Test::Exception, my hesiation centring around the problem that it isn't a core module, so how to guarantee testing against it. The suggestion was to use M::B and 'build_require' it. So I don't really want to back out of that now -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
