Stan Gammons wrote: > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 23:24 +0100, Bernhard Frühmesser wrote: >> I have installed a pre 1.9.0 version more than a year ago, since there i >> haven´t done any update as for the things i need it it works. > > I "think" it was around 2/20/2007 when the bug was introduced. Any > mpeg2enc code after then, an possibly now, had the over compression > problem. I don't know what version that was. I'm sure others here would > know. > >> I was just wondering why the file size differs so much from compressor >> and mpeg2enc, as for both i can´t see any difference in quality. > > Oh. Does the video playback at normal speed? Is the audio in sync?
Video playback is at normal speed and the audio is in sync, the quality "is" the same as the file compressor created (well, i don´t see a difference) just the file size from compressor is about 416MB while the filesize from the mpeg2enc created file is about 116MB, so i was wondering if mpeg2enc uses different (maybe newer) compression features than compressor does. I just tested Compressor and mpeg2enc with another video, and here again both video look fine but the file that mpeg2enc created is much smaller in filesize. Weird. Thanks, BF. > Stan > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Mjpeg-users mailing list > Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
