I have installed a pre 1.9.0 version more than a year ago, since there i haven´t done any update as for the things i need it it works.
I was just wondering why the file size differs so much from compressor and mpeg2enc, as for both i can´t see any difference in quality. Thanks, BF. Stan Gammons wrote: > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 22:06 +0100, Bernhard Frühmesser wrote: >> I am sure i used the same settings on both computers but the file >> created on the Mac with Compressor has about 415MB while the file >> created with mpeg2enc has only 114MB so far i don´t see much quality >> difference. > > What version of mjpegtools are you using? A little over a year ago, > IIRC, a bug was introduced into mpeg2enc which caused it to over > compress files. The bug remained in the CVS head until a couple of > months ago. I think that's when the author worked on it an got it to > working better anyway. There is still some discussion on whether it is > now fixed. Some say yes an some say no. I haven't had a chance to update > any of the linux video tools I use, so I can't comment on it one way or > the other. > > > Stan > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Mjpeg-users mailing list > Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
