Hallo > Way to go! That's it. > It looks far better than with yuvdenoise, almost identical with the > original DV file. No more blockiness. Some very difficult scenes are > slightly smeared (flat distant slow-flowing river surface rippling in > moderate wind while camera sweeps left and right - on the MPEG2 you > cannot see those tiny ripples anymore) but i betcha it's only visible on > a computer screen, not on TV (and only if you know how the original DV > looks like). Very likely. Ususally you loose such details when filtering. You can always say that you had the focus on a other object ;)
> I find it surprising i'm having so many difficulties and yet results are > only moderately good (not perfect) while commercial DVDs, at the same > resolution (720x480), using smaller bitrate, offer a much better image > quality. > Is it due to the codecs they use? Which codec ? They can only use MPEG2. It is very likely that they have a better mpeg2encoder. You usually wont/cant efford. After all the equipemnt they use for creating DVDs is far more expensive that what you have. For my experience the comercial DVD's usually have a very high Bitrate. At least the PAL DVD does have a bitrate always near the 9MBit. I have not yet seen sequences where the bitrate is at 5Mbit. At least not in the main movie. auf hoffentlich bald, Berni the Chaos of Woodquarter Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.lysator.liu.se/~gz/bernhard ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
