On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 07:51, Matto Marjanovic wrote: > > >> On 10 Feb 2003 20:40:29 -0800 > >> Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >What is the reason it is preferred to increase the size of the image > >(from 704 to 768)? The information remains the same after all > >(notwithstanding the interpolation noise). > >Is it because it is preferred to have the final product in a standard > >image size? > > The only reason to rescale is if you want/need square pixels. Unless a > piece of graphics software is specifically aware of non-square pixel aspect > ratio, it will assume that an image has square pixels.
Yes, i understand that. Sorry for not explaining myself too clear. My question was... > And if that is what you want, it is preferential to scale horizontally (even > though it simply interpolates to create more pixels), because vertical > scaling is complicated by the interlacing. It's always best to leave > the vertical size alone with interlaced streams. ...yep, that's it. I wanted to understand why enlarge the horizontal size and not compress the vertical size. Now i got it, thanks. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
