On 10 Feb 2003, Aaron Newsome wrote: > > I do have trouble telling the difference between DV->MPEG2 and broadcast > though. When I say it looks as good as the original signal, I'm not > kidding. Of course if you watch long enough you will eventually see some > MPEG cruft that will give it away as being a recording.
If you're recording off digital satellite, you'll see block noise in the original broadcast signal if you look for it. I never used to notice it, but since I started doing my own encodes and trying to get everything perfect, I notice it in a *lot* of DirecTV broadcast video now. > Also, I did try using the denoiser a few months back. Actually encoded > and burned to DVD a whole bunch of video that was run through the > denoiser. We stopped using it because we all agreed that the denoiser > made the video look WORSE. Probably not the case with mjpeg video, but > that is my experience with DV. It helps a great deal on stuff coming off VHS tape, though. :-) > I hesitate to call *anything* perfect, but for my money, the Canopus, > dvgrab, kino and mjpegtools is it for me. Yep. I'm a happy camper with that setup as well. > --Aaron -- Robert Kesterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
