On Friday 07 February 2003 21:10, Ronald Bultje wrote:
> Although even high-quality MJPEG has some annoying noise, I don't
> consider this much of a problem, the resulting MPEG never looks bad at
> all here (long live denoising)... MJPEG certainly isn't perfect, but can
> you really see the difference between the end products where the
> intermediate material was MJPEG or DV, respectively?
>
> I can't...

It would be interesting indeed to run some comparisons between, say, a DC10+ 
and that DV thingy. Especially with cable video, and see how well the 
one-setting-fits-all-needs really works when you throw actual TV on it.

But, _my_ MJPEG card does, surprisingly, work well enough that I'm not 
interested in buying more hardware just to make such a comparison. *shrug* 
The next step for me would be either realtime MPEG compression hardware or a 
DVB-C (I think cable is C, anyway) card, so I can snarf the MPEG data 
directly from the source.

/Sam



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to