On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:33 AM, Oliver Peter <li...@peter.de.com> wrote: > On 1/14/11 10:06 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote: >> 2011/1/14 Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net>: >>> > nsd is already part of the tree and unbound will join it at some point to >>> > replace bind. B they are well documented, fairly easy to use, and unbound is >>> > available through ports. use it. >> But a DNSSSEC validiating resolver should be in base, not ports. > > From what I've heard that's already the plan: > B B B B http://old.nabble.com/Re:-Testing-NSD-p29509010.html > >
Looks like peter answered my question before I asked it :-) -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
