On 1/14/11 10:06 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote: > 2011/1/14 Chris Cappuccio <ch...@nmedia.net>: >> > nsd is already part of the tree and unbound will join it at some point to >> > replace bind. they are well documented, fairly easy to use, and unbound is >> > available through ports. use it. > But a DNSSSEC validiating resolver should be in base, not ports.
>From what I've heard that's already the plan: http://old.nabble.com/Re:-Testing-NSD-p29509010.html