> PayPal's terms of use do not permit soliciting crime. Paypal's terms of use are just that; terms of use. The account was being run by the German charity WHS.
Noone has said that wikileaks has commited a crime. What statute are you talking about? > Wikileaks > solicits the > holders of US security clearances to violate their > non-disclosure agreements. > That is a crime. I hereby ask anyone who holds secrets that the world should know of, which may contain indications of real crimes having been commited should send them to wikileaks. Did I just commit a crime? Oh, remember I do not live in the US. > Some people think it should not be a crime. But it is. Some people > think that it matters that WIkileaks says that they do not ask for > submissions. That matters about as much as a mob boss saying that he > didn't ask anyone to shoot so-and-so, just that wouldn't it be > fortunate if someone > did? Wikileaks model is predicated on breaking > NDAs, and based on what their > cite on their front pages, breaking NDAs > on US classified information is their > biggest product center. You think it should be a crime. You just justified skipping due process. I hope that one day due process is denied you.
