On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:18 PM, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for making my point! There's no good reason why git should require > X, so the package version should not. Now I understand why there's so many issues in the world. Love you way you deliberately misinterpret my words. I hope that's not what you do as chief scientist at work. But your argument is correct. There's no good reason why git should require X. Go bitch at the upstream for including Wish. Tell them to separate it out into two packages. git and git-gui. Let us know what Linus tells you. KTHXHAND -- http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation. "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0&feature=related
