On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:41 PM, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Marc Espie wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:02AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote: > > > If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package > is > > > broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation). > > > > You don't get it, so I'll explain it. > > > Yes, I DO get it, but, unfortunately, you don't. Having an 'X' version of > something as fundamental as a version control system is just plain dumb. > Unfortunately, it appears that you don't get it. I just downloaded the git source code from the main repository. it comes with a bunch of X related things. The INSTALL file talks about wish and git-gui. This indicates that the main package requires X. Marc's comments about not wasting time is the correct thing. > That has nothing to do with flavors! What if CVS required X? I doubt it > Flavors is what enables the no_x11 option. What do you not understand about packages? If CVS requires X, then it requires X. You need to understand OpenBSD's philosophy. Why are services enabled that you will typically disable while "hardening" a linux box? It's in the FAQ. That is why OpenBSD's maintainers say, go ahead and install X if your package needs it. In any case, it's in the maintainer's hands, as he has control. The point > of the discussion was to suggest that the no-X11 version BE the default > package, and I think that point has been made. > As Marc indicated - lack of time or interest would be the primary reasons. -- http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." -- Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation. "Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0&feature=related
