On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:39:18PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote: > On Jan 6, 2008 10:35 PM, Gilles Chehade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:46:42PM +0530, V. Karthik Kumar wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > > I don't care about puppy linux or slax, I am just pointing out that > > > > you talked out of your ass and made an uninformed comment again > > > > when you said that openbsd ships with nothing. > > > > > > > I am sorry. It ships with utter crap. > > > > > > > >> > > > >> No. I say calling it 'secure by default' is an oxymoron. > > > > > > > > Yet, you fail to argument and comment on the whole paragraph above. > > > > OpenBSD ships with a lot of things and users enable them if they > > > > need them, whatever you say or think of this won't make it change. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It ships with only what the developers want and care about. And only > > > FEW people ever find all of what it ships useful. Most of them find > > > what they want in the ports tree and not in the base. If you can find > > > more people who like it with what it ships than those who think > > > otherwise, bring them to me and prove me wrong. > > > > > > > So what is your point ? > > > > > > > > Obviously OpenBSD is less than a blackbox than any other system you > > > > can come up with. I can create a copy of the official cdrom by > > > > using only the content in cvs, while if I do the same with another > > > > system I will probably be missing a few drivers. > > > > > > > Fancy Blackbox. What do I care? I'm not a programmer. > > > > > > > So what is your point ? > > > > So far, the only point you made was that you are clueless. > > > > You've been fighting all along too. You said many things yourself. You > should know what the point is. I end our discussion here. >
I haven't been fighting, I've been setting the record straight so that people who lookup about OpenBSD get the real facts and not junk thrown by a fsf zealot. I have requested *several times* that you point JUST ONE fact where we are in breach with out license and goals, and you failed to do that. I can't believe you find so many things to say, unrelated on to another, yet you cannot find ONE real fact to throw at my face to backup any of your claims. As you said you are not a programmer, yet you talk about things you do not comprehend. Your are not a sysadmin (or a real bad one) and you do think you know how a system should be configured out of the box. It is in your best interest to just shut up now, before your name appears on all search engines associated to this pile of junk you kept sending. A future employer may lookup your history and see what an idiot you are. Oh, and should you send mail to me again, let the list cc-ed. Bye. Gilles -- Gilles Chehade
