On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:46:42PM +0530, V. Karthik Kumar wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gilles Chehade wrote: > > I don't care about puppy linux or slax, I am just pointing out that > > you talked out of your ass and made an uninformed comment again > > when you said that openbsd ships with nothing. > > > I am sorry. It ships with utter crap. > > > >> > >> No. I say calling it 'secure by default' is an oxymoron. > > > > Yet, you fail to argument and comment on the whole paragraph above. > > OpenBSD ships with a lot of things and users enable them if they > > need them, whatever you say or think of this won't make it change. > > > > > > > It ships with only what the developers want and care about. And only > FEW people ever find all of what it ships useful. Most of them find > what they want in the ports tree and not in the base. If you can find > more people who like it with what it ships than those who think > otherwise, bring them to me and prove me wrong. >
So what is your point ? > > Obviously OpenBSD is less than a blackbox than any other system you > > can come up with. I can create a copy of the official cdrom by > > using only the content in cvs, while if I do the same with another > > system I will probably be missing a few drivers. > > > Fancy Blackbox. What do I care? I'm not a programmer. > So what is your point ? So far, the only point you made was that you are clueless. -- Gilles Chehade
