On Oct 24, 2007, at 9:20 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Looking at what you've written, you seem to consider OpenBSD to be
pretty secure. By extension, let's assume the developers, and Theo in
particular, have some darned good knowledge about security and some
priorities in that regard. Then, when Theo and developers (and
others in
this community) weigh in and tell you that virtualization is not more
secure, but less, you continue and continue.
Well, since a lot of people on this list like to continue diverting
the
discussion way out in space with far reaching, unrelated tangential
arguments, I can only say that this discussion has descend well
below any
level of utilization.
You apparently missed my post. Allow me to re-summarize the situation.
There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having
it *more secure* than not having it at all.
Is that direct enough for you?
---
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
