On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:44:37PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote: > At 05:27 PM 10/24/2007 -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote: >> L. V. Lammert wrote: >> <gibberish> > > Wow, such intelligence!!!! Now we get crap instead of ostrich logic. > Sheesh.
Actually, that's a fair assessment at this point. Looking at what you've written, you seem to consider OpenBSD to be pretty secure. By extension, let's assume the developers, and Theo in particular, have some darned good knowledge about security and some priorities in that regard. Then, when Theo and developers (and others in this community) weigh in and tell you that virtualization is not more secure, but less, you continue and continue. As someone who doesn't know a great deal about virtualization, I can tell you that you're not convincing me of anything with your arguments. I feel confident in saying that you're not convincing any of the devs, either. And I doubt you've done much for this cause with the list members at large. So what the hell are you doing? Just flaming now? Gave up trying to show something and just trying to get a few jabs in? As someone who reads this list and would like to know more about virtualization, pros and cons, I ask you to put more actual meat into your posts if you're going to continue. As it stands, <gibberish> fits all too well. -- Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
