> Certainly there is a small, compount risk increase due to multiple OS
> images involved, but the OS images must be analyzed independently FIRST,
> and THOSE risks addressed.
Certainly you pulled that assesment out of your ass.
> **IF** OBSD were available as a host OS, that would be good security.
You must be more qualified with regards to the actual code than I am
because I flat out don't believe this at all.
> If
> not, then security issues compound due to multiple guest OSs and each set
> of inherent vulnerabilities.
security issues and protections do not add up like numbers.
> No matter how you twist the logic, however, a VM provides a good level of
> application domain security, from the standpoint that each set of domain
> users and applications can only see the services provided within that
> domain guest OS.
The phrase "application domain security" is a cover-up statement that
means "I have already decided to run the multiple things on one box
because I am cheap, and I need to invent reasons why I can continue
doing so".
