On Wednesday 24 October 2007 16:14:19 Chris Kuethe wrote: > On 10/24/07, carlopmart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear sirs please: I will return to my original question. I just wondered > > if xen will be included into the OpenBSD's kernel to act as a > > para-virtualized DomU or not. Nothing more. I will not go into issues of > > the type is insecure or not. > > > > Theo, or somebody from developer team: Will be para-virtualized domU xen > > kernel included on next OpenBSD release (4.3?) or not?? I only want to > > know this... > > Not unless someone actually writes the code to do it. Notice the > extreme number of people with openbsd.org email addresses jumping up > and down, volunteering to do it (hint: none). Possibly not even if > someone writes the code. Diffs are not always merged. They should be > good diffs that improve OpenBSD. Notice the number of people with > openbsd.org email addresses who are not convinced that doing this a) > will improve OpenBSD and b) won't actually hurt. > > So I'm going to guess the answer is "No, integrating xen > paravirtualization is not a project priority at this time. Also, where > are your diffs?"
The OpenBSD/Xen source is at http://hg.recoil.org/openbsd-xen-sys.hg Unfortunately, Anil has troubles with the availability of the server. I rely on having a willing OpenBSD developer who commits the patches I send to him. But as long as there is none, it doesn't go in. Christoph
