Christoph Egger wrote:
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 17:25:25 Artur Grabowski wrote:
Christoph Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So I'm going to guess the answer is "No, integrating xen
paravirtualization is not a project priority at this time. Also, where
are your diffs?"
The OpenBSD/Xen source is at http://hg.recoil.org/openbsd-xen-sys.hg
Unfortunately, Anil has troubles with the availability of the server.
I rely on having a willing OpenBSD developer who commits the patches I
send to him. But as long as there is none, it doesn't go in.
I'm willing to stretch as far as saying: This might be interesting for
some testing purposes for kernel hackers if Xen could be hosted on
OpenBSD.
But this doesn't mean that I'm even close to volunteering doing the
job. It just would be cool to have if it doesn't break stuff.
//art
Actually it is good to find NULL-pointer (mostly use-after-free) bugs,
that are hard to find on real hardware.
Believe me or not: OpenBSD has tons of them.
Christoph
Christoph,
One question about your Xen port: is it possible to compile a xen
para-virtualized openbsd kernel to launch a clean OpenBSD 4.1 or 4.2 install??
Thanks for your great job Christoph.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
