Hmmm had Theo ever talked about this on the list?

I think many people are/will find this to be very strange... WPA is
considered as "broken" and "insecure", which is understandable for a
OS that focuses on security... but it _does_ provide WEP, a even more
broken, insecure solution?

2007/3/29, Nick ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 3/29/07, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/29, Nick ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 3/29/07, Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Maxime DERCHE wrote:
> > > > IMHO you should think to configure your AP to provide a WAP-based
> > > > encryption...
> > >
> > > WAP-based encryption? Do you mean WPA?
> >
> > And to answer the original question: because OpenBSD doesn't support
> > WPA, and Theo has claimed somewhere that I can never find the link to
> > that WPA gives a false sense of security anyway.
> >
> I am curious about this too, so if anyone got the link it would be
> great to post it, thanks.

Here you go:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jon Radel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mar 29, 2007 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: Long WEP key
To: Nick ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Nick ! wrote:
>
> Theo has claimed somewhere that I can never find the link to

http://www.tjrforum.com/archive/index.php/t-2513.html gives a quote but
I can't find the original source.




--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Reply via email to