On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 08:22:23PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > As I see it, the only way we are going to get documentation, is for it
> > to make economic sense for nVidia.
> > Cost of documentation / Perceived loss of IP ($) through documentation
> > (+ corporate inertia) must be less than the perceived damage to brand
> > through exploits, which must be less than the profit / brand recognition
> > / loyalty from sales into Linux/BSD market.
> > 
> > $Docs < $Damage < $Sales
> > 
> > If that equation doesn't work out, they won't do anything.
> 
> Thanks for the lesson!  I guess we were dreaming every time some other
> vendor was convinced to give us documentation!
> 
> But Craig, it's the same with women.  They'll only hang out with you
> if they feel there is enough positive vibe in you.  And since you so
> clearly show that you are a pessimist at heart, you're out of luck
> too!
> 
> If you keep saying something good won't happen -- well then you can
> bet it won't happen.

I don't get your point Theo.

One should be optimistic of course but also practical. Craig is both.

In fact most practical statements sound pessimistic, but not so in reality.

I am wondering if you agree with him or not!

Anyway I sincerely hope that hardware vendors start behaving sensibly...

Though I am also somewhat pessimistic about it. Unless forced to change these 
people simply won't understand what is good for them.

regards,
Girish

Reply via email to