On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:50:31 -0600 Tim Pushor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Friends, > > I am wondering anyone can think of why I shouldn't provide secondary > DNS services from a carp cluster of OpenBSD systems? I have an issue > where my primary DNS server is non-redundant, and trying to find a > good place for a secondary. I have a cluster of OpenBSD machines > acting as a router/firewall and would be real convenient to put it > there. > > I'd like it to respond to queries on the carp address .. > > Can anyone think of a reason to not do this? > > Thanks, > Tim > You could use carp, but easier redundancy is already built into the DNS system. Look into a slave DNS server. Travers Buda
