Ryan McBride wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:15:44PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:58:39AM -0600, Tim Pushor wrote:
Only question is to whether or not to use the/a carp address for the DNS.
It will work, but as noted, there's no particular reason to do this;
redundancy is built into the DNS protocol.
There are some broken resolvers *cough*OS X*cough* which will not
correctly round-robin through the list of DNS servers, or will cache the
IP of the first server that responds and continue to try that address.
Not only the OS X, there is one in Redmond as well that have many still
broken in operations, even very recent one as well.
