On Monday, August 28, 2006, 12:50:31, Tim Pushor wrote: > I am wondering anyone can think of why I shouldn't provide secondary DNS > services from a carp cluster of OpenBSD systems? I have an issue where > my primary DNS server is non-redundant, and trying to find a good place > for a secondary. I have a cluster of OpenBSD machines acting as a > router/firewall and would be real convenient to put it there.
By "secondary DNS" do you mean a slave? If so the concern is usually to separate it physically and network wise from the master to reduce the likelihood of a backhoe, extended power failure, etc. removing all your authoritative name servers. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The avalanche has already started, it is too Rod Dorman late for the pebbles to vote." - Ambassador Kosh
