> > (I am considering getting a laptop with openBSD, but have > > not yet done so, which is why I can't easily check on my own.) > > > > Does openBSD come with a web browser? > > The "the FAQ and" parts of https://www.openbsd.org/mail.html > > suggest that it does, but I haven't found any more > > detail regarding this at https://www.openbsd.org/ . > > Quite frankly, if you're incapable of using one, I'd steer clear. > The answer to this is the result of a very basic web search. > Cheers!
Perhaps I should steer clear anyway, but what's probably the reason I didn't find that answer may change things. Specifically, do you find that information with a basic web search while using none of Stackexchange , Reddit , Youtube , Google ? For the reasons explained in the following paragraphs, I am not willing to use those four sites. I still got into results saying that one _can easily install_ Firefox on openBSD, and remember at least one result saying that some people _use_ Lynx _on_ it, but those didn't address whether there's one that comes _already_ installed. I did go into results saying that one _can easily install_ Firefox on openBSD, and remember at least one result saying that some people _use_ Lynx _on_ it, but those didn't address whether there's one that comes _already_ installed. The other search results (from using duckduckgo) I found that mentioned openBSD - as opposed to just freeBSD - were all from stackexchange and reddit and youtube. I left Stackexchange when it adopted Terms according to which, them changing those terms other than the arbitration clause as I am scrolling a page on their site would result in me being bound by whatever they changed the Terms to. Since the trigger for those Terms was something like, using their Network in any way, I have never intentionally gone back there, and have left immediately when I've accidentally when I've accidentally gone back there. (In particular, if they no longer have such Terms then I don't know that.) My brief search for Reddit's Terms brought up Reddit result previews suggesting that Reddit's Terms are also such that according to them, using their site to view their terms would constitute acceptance of those terms. Furthermore, according to https://github.com/OpenTermsArchive/contrib-versions /blob/main/Reddit/Terms%20of%20Service.md , the changes provision in Reddit's Terms manages to be even worse than that of Stackexchange's Terms: Its change-acceptance is from access to or use of "the Services on or after the Effective Date of the revised Terms", and it does not say the Effective Date can't be _before_ the revised Terms were posted. Youtube's Terms are better, but (0) it's Google, and (1) the "launch a new product or feature" exception is merely a timing restriction: It's not limited to changes that have anything else to do with the new product or feature. Google's Terms seem to have the same changes provision. Eric Demer
