On Mar 29 10:25:34, fbax...@gmail.com wrote:
> I copied all files from /mnt/wd1l to /mnt/wd2l
> wd2l is slightly larger than wd1l; yet wd2l is full!
> $ df -h /mnt/wd1l /mnt/wd2l
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/wd1l 1020G 952G 16.5G 98% /mnt/wd1l
> /dev/wd2l 1020G 969G -508M 100% /mnt/wd2l
Why are you copying an almost full disk over to another,
not really larger, that will also end up being almost full?
On Mar 29 12:14:01, fbax...@gmail.com wrote:
> du reported different sizes for several dozen folders that contain files
> created by scan to PDF. Not all of the scanned files were affected;
Meaning, the destination takes up (as in du)
the same amount of space as the original?
> but some might contain mostly blank pages.
I don't think a blank paper page scanned into a PDF
results in a block of zeros in the PDF file.
> rsync -anvS does NOT report these files!
What do you mean by "report"?
Being copied over anew as sparse, now that you say -S?
rsync will no do that if the destination file exists.
> Is there an easy way to make these
> files to be sparse on wd2l?
I would just recreate the fs on wd2l and
run rsync again, with -S now, just to see.
Is there a way to explicitly find sparse files on a fs?
One could stat every file and naively compare st_size vs st_blocks ...
Jan
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:32 AM Aner Perez <a...@ncstech.com> wrote:
>
> > You may have large files with "holes" in them (i.e. sparse files). Rsync
> > has a --sparse
> > (-S) flag that tries to create holes in the replicated files when it finds
> > sequences of
> > nulls in the source file.
> >
> > The -a flag does not turn on this sparse file handling.
> >
> > You can run "du" on different directories to narrow down where the file
> > size difference is
> > coming from.
> >
> > - Aner
> >
> > On 3/29/22 10:58, F Bax wrote:
> > > I used rsync to copy files.
> > > sudo rsync -anv --delete /mnt/wd1l/ /mnt/wd2l/
> > > reports no changes required (runtime under 3 minutes).
> > > sudo diff -r /mnt/wd1l/ /mnt/wd2l/
> > > reports no difference (runtime 10 hours)
> > >
> > > $ sudo df -i /mnt/wd1l/ /mnt/wd2l/
> > > Filesystem 512-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused
> > > Mounted on
> > > /dev/wd1l 2138940784 1997329632 34664128 98% 483707 33313411
> > 1%
> > > /mnt/wd1l
> > > /dev/wd2l 2138951776 2033043696 -1039504 100% 483707 33313411
> > 1%
> > > /mnt/wd2l
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:49 AM F Bax <fbax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I used rsync to copy files. df -i reports 483707 inodes used for both
> > >> partitions.
> > >> sudo rsync -anv --delete /mnt/wd1l/ /mnt/wd2l/
> > >> reports no changes required (runtime under 3 minutes).
> > >> sudo diff -r /mnt/wd1l/ /mnt/wd2l/
> > >> reports no difference (runtime 10 hours)
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:39 AM Otto Moerbeek <o...@drijf.net> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:25:34AM -0400, F Bax wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I copied all files from /mnt/wd1l to /mnt/wd2l
> > >>>>
> > >>>> wd2l is slightly larger than wd1l; yet wd2l is full!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> $ df -h /mnt/wd1l /mnt/wd2l
> > >>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> > >>>> /dev/wd1l 1020G 952G 16.5G 98% /mnt/wd1l
> > >>>> /dev/wd2l 1020G 969G -508M 100% /mnt/wd2l
> > >>> How did you copy? Some forms of copy will cause hardlinked files to be
> > >>> separate files on the destination. df -i will tell how many inodes you
> > >>> have used. If wd2l has more inodes in use, I bet it's that.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Otto
> > >>>
> > >>>> Output from disklabel is almost identical:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> type: SCSI
> > >>>> disk: SCSI disk
> > >>>> label: WDC WD2000FYYZ-0
> > >>>> flags:
> > >>>> bytes/sector: 512
> > >>>> sectors/track: 63
> > >>>> tracks/cylinder: 255
> > >>>> sectors/cylinder: 16065
> > >>>> cylinders: 243201
> > >>>> total sectors: 3907029168
> > >>>> rpm: 0
> > >>>> interleave: 1
> > >>>> trackskew: 0
> > >>>> cylinderskew: 0
> > >>>> headswitch: 0 # microseconds
> > >>>> track-to-track seek: 3907029168 # microseconds
> > >>>> drivedata: 0
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Difference between wd1 and wd2:
> > >>>> wd1: interleave: 0
> > >>>> wd2: interleave: 1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Partition details (A added 'wd1/wd2' to beginning of line:
> > >>>> # size offset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
> > >>>> wd1l: 2147472640 525486208 4.2BSD 8192 65536 1
> > >>>> wd2l: 2147483647 63 4.2BSD 8192 65536 1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Why is wd2l full?
> >
> >
>
