Howdy Stuart,

On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 11:17, Stuart Longland <stua...@longlandclan.id.au> wrote:
>
> On 8/1/20 1:25 am, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > And yes, ffs performance sucks, but nor me nor you provide any diff to
> > change that so we can just shut up and use what's available.
>
> Okay, question is if not ffs, then what?
>
> - Other BSDs have ZFS… is it viable to port that to OpenBSD?  (Maybe
> it's been done before?  I didn't check.)

As far as im aware there are 2 concerns about ZFS,
1) its license  is not BSD /ISC  you can use it and make money and not be sued,
but it is more restrictive than BSD / ISC
2) then there is the Number of Lines of code, which I believe is far longer than
the OpenBSD code base,  who and what team would manage the
introduction of that code
and the risks that come with that  large a code base.

> - FreeBSD has UFS2, DragonFlyBSD has HAMMER…  Could we borrow their code?
> - If we could clean-room implement a BSD-licensed

as a user I would say sweet...  but someone more knowledgable /
involved in the project would
need to see a diff before a determination can be made.


> EXT3/EXT4/BTRFS/XFS/JFS/whatever, following style(8), would there be
> interest in supporting that in OpenBSD?
what is the story with the license? if the license is not ISC / BSD I
dont think it would be in base..

as a user I would say more filessytems sweet...  but someone more
knowledgeable / involved in the project would
need to see a diff before a determination can be made.

> - Or do we implement yet another file system?  (Seems like too much work
> for not much gain IMO.)

as an OpenBSD user I would say that the performance of Network
is dependent on your hardware. / the specific hardware Driver
compatibility /capability in OpenBSD,
I have had a different performance experience depending on the
hardware I was using, and the
maturity of the Driver support for that hardware.

I have found the em(4) supported nics are pretty good ix(4) has solid
performance
vmx(4) have been good but it is dependent on the Vmware version you are using ,
and then others like vio(4) interfaces I have not had as good a
performance. but that
is more due to the age of the drivers and their capability vs what
newer virtio drivers can do.

But as a number of members of the OpenBSD Project have said to me
Diffs are welcome ...   Good Diffs will be considered....
just bear in mind the the License Requirements and Coding Style  KNF
when submitting a diff and do it off current...

>
> Regards,
> --
> Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)
>
> I haven't lost my mind...
>   ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.
>


-- 
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.

Reply via email to