It's 2020 and you are sending a link to article from 2018?
Anyway, you (phoronix) compare '90 ffs technology with state of the art
of current storage/fs in linuxes/bsd represented by XFS/Ext4 and ZFS
filesystems and you compare with the winner right? Kind of unfair don't
you think?
And yes, ffs performance sucks, but nor me nor you provide any diff to
change that so we can just shut up and use what's available.
On 1/7/20 3:35 PM, Hamd wrote:
It's 2020 and it's -still- sad to see OpenBSD -still- has the > lowest/poorest (general/overall) performance ever: >
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=8-linux-bsd&num=1 >
> > My reference is not -only- that url, of course. My reference is my
OpenBSD,
giving ~8 MB/s file transfer/network/disk speed. > > A Linux distro, on the same computer (dual boot), providing 89
MB/s > speed. > > (Longest) sad story of the year: When it comes to
OpenBSD; security - > great! Performance - horrible! I truly wish it was
much better.. > > No, I'm not a fan of Calomel.
