>On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:24:47PM GMT, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> >Ingo, >> > >> >On Mar 05 18:11:31, schwa...@usta.de wrote: >> >> By the way, lynx(1) removal doesn't really hurt that much. >> >> Rotten code that will hurt more when it will finally be deleted >> >> includes, for example, the sqlite3(1) library and file(1). >> > >> >can you please elaborate on what's rotten in sqlite? >> >> Jan, can you please start from the other end, and provide evidence >> that the code is of the highest possible quality? > >Hi Theo, > >Based on the above, Jan hadn't made any such claims so no evidence is >required. He only asked Ingo to support *his* claim - more info, for >mere reference, if nothing else, would be greatly appreciated. :^)
Please run something else. You'll be happier. Really. You don't need code-fussy people around you.
