On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:24:47PM GMT, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >Ingo, > > > >On Mar 05 18:11:31, schwa...@usta.de wrote: > >> By the way, lynx(1) removal doesn't really hurt that much. > >> Rotten code that will hurt more when it will finally be deleted > >> includes, for example, the sqlite3(1) library and file(1). > > > >can you please elaborate on what's rotten in sqlite? > > Jan, can you please start from the other end, and provide evidence > that the code is of the highest possible quality?
Hi Theo, Based on the above, Jan hadn't made any such claims so no evidence is required. He only asked Ingo to support *his* claim - more info, for mere reference, if nothing else, would be greatly appreciated. :^) Cheers, Raf
